Faden – Introducing a Character

There are different ways to introduce a character depending on the style and theme of your book. In the chapter, Introducing a Character by Lodge, he outlined the ways of introduction. There is the simple way where the author lists physical characteristics straight out the bat, and there is another way where the author makes the reader figure out traits about a character through the story. Lodge states that typically the formal introductions of listing physical and emotional traits about a character are slightly older techniques; this is a basic way of beginning your story and in my opinion, doesn’t grab the reader’s attention as much as the other way. By letting the reader discover characters traits on their own through the characters sayings and actions, it keeps the reader interested. People nowadays don’t want to be given the straight facts, they want to feel like they are discovering something and figuring it out on their own. Lodge says that this technique in introducing a character is the more modern technique.

 

Kurt Vonnegut is a modern style artist, he uses some normal and some very bizarre events and adds weird characters to them in order to create action. Vonnegut’s main thing is including weird characters and playing with the reader and the character’s emotions. The question is, in what way does he do this? In his work the modern style of letting the reader figure out his character is used. He does give basic background, however, lets the psychological aspect of the character be figured out by the reader. For example in the short story “Who Am I This Time” he does state that Helene is an antisocial woman who constantly moves, he doesn’t explicitly say she doesn’t know her identity and is conflicted about her place in life, neither does he straight out say she falls in love with Harry; Vonnegut likes to have his readers figure these things out. In a way, this subtle way of letting a character be discovered makes his stories open to interpretation. If all facts were given then it would be harder to maybe find something in the character that relates to you, which is what Vonnegut aims to do. He wants you to be able to understand his characters the way you want to understand them. There is another example of this in “Harrison Bergeron”, the author is slightly required to say certain characteristics in order to fill the gaps in what’s going on. Because this short story is a fictional bizarre idea, he needs to give context for readers to understand the backstory. This backstory of characters is the characters’ physical description; their handicaps due to the ‘equality’ given to all in this specific short story. Vonnegut gave the basic information towards the introduction of the story then left the rest up to interpretation by the reader.

 

What we can conclude from Vonnegut’s work using the Lodge chapter “Introducing a Character” is that Vonnegut is a very modern style writer who plays to the needs of younger readers. He lightly introduces the basic physical characteristics of the character however leaves most psychological and ‘interesting’ traits up to the reader to find out. This technique creates an attachment from the reader to the character. Discovering things about the character that make you relate them to your real life is a very important aspect with gaining attention and appreciation from your readers.

 

Personally, when I write my own short story in Vonnegut’s style of writing I plan on doing the same thing. His style in progressively letting out characters’ details kept me on my feet, as well as allowed me to come to a final conclusion towards the end of which characters I felt like I related to most. In my opinion, with making a short story you should form it like the reader is meeting a real person, when meeting someone you don’t learn everything off the bat, you progressively get to know them. This is the way I plan on bringing Vonnegut’s ideas into my writing.

5 thoughts on “Faden – Introducing a Character

  1. I feel like you shouldn’t include a reflection at the end of the essay. A better thing to work on is just a simple overall conclusion of your thesis, rather than your personal thought. Hope this helps.

    And I had a hard time finding your thesis. I feel like it should’ve been more elaborate or distinctive from most of the sentences. Hope this helps. Best regards

    Like

  2. Hey Sadeem! Good work. I know Hamza disliked your reflection. However, I enjoyed it. Though I am not sure of what the requirements are, I feel that your reflection was a clear form of critical thinking. I can tell you not only understood what you read, but you related to it.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I agree with the point you made in the novel “Who Am I This Time” where the author did describe the outer appearance of the characters but he also left a few parts of the characters personality for the readers to find out. when reading the novel i found it personally hard to figure out the character of helena and who she really is. she covers that up through her acting in the play which make it a little confusing to the readers. i loved your reflection in the end but i agree with hamza your thesis was not very clear. overall it was pretty goog 😉

      Like

  3. Hey Sadeem<3
    I really like how you introduced the "Introducing a character" by David Lodge at first then followed by clearly connecting it with the Kurt Vonnegut short stories. This made it more simple to follow along with your essay and understand the point that you are trying to get across. You also use more than one more than one short story which helps make your argument stronger. The only thing I would recommend is too elaborate more on your thesis statement.

    Like

  4. Hey Sadeem when reading your analysis I wish that you made your thesis more detailed so the reader can get a very clear understanding of what they’re going to be reading. But I enjoyed reading your reflection at the end I feel like it really tied everything together nicely. Good job!

    Like

Leave a comment